![best lg wide monitor under 400 best lg wide monitor under 400](https://www.imore.com/sites/imore.com/files/styles/w1600h900crop/public/field/image/2020/03/best-ultrawide-monitors-hero.jpg)
- #Best lg wide monitor under 400 Pc#
- #Best lg wide monitor under 400 series#
- #Best lg wide monitor under 400 tv#
Other notable ultrawide monitors include the Alienware AW3420DW if you want a premium IPS ultrawide monitor. But, again, the Nitro XV340CK P costs half as much as the 34GP83A. Yes, it’s noticeably slower (but still fast enough for a great 144Hz gaming experience), dimmer (about 250 nit peak brightness), and it isn’t using a wide color gamut panel as the 34GP83A. This is an IPS, 34-inch ultrawide that costs half as much as the LG 34GP83A. When it comes to the best budget ultrawide monitor, it has to be the Acer Nitro XV340CK P. Its biggest downside is less than 1000:1 contrast ratio. Overall, the 38GL950G is a great deal since it’s 20 percent cheaper than the 34GN850. 440 nits on the 34GN850) and these are pretty much all of the differences. The peak brightness is also slightly lower (400 nits vs. This is a cheaper version of the LG’s flagship 34GN850 that has a bit slower response time (less than 1ms difference) and a narrower color gamut (about 77% coverage of the DCI-P3 compared to 83% coverage on the 34GN850). If 34-inches of ultrawide screen real estate is enough for you, we recommend the LG 34GP83A. The best 38-inch alternative is the Acer Predator X38 P followed by the Alienware AW3821DW. Also, there’s the very high price the 38GL950G is selling at. In fact, the only major downside is the meager contrast ratio that isn’t great for gaming in a dark environment. This is an IPS monitor that has lots of strong sides. And the absolute best ultrawide gaming monitor at the moment is the LG 38GL950G-B.
![best lg wide monitor under 400 best lg wide monitor under 400](https://www.omnicoreagency.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/LG-34BK95U-W-UltraFine-34-List.jpg)
LG 34GP83A-B & 38GL950G-B: Best ultrawide gaming monitors for the RTX 30īoth the RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 are excellent choices for high refresh rate ultrawide gaming. Its downsides are lower than average response time and a ridiculous price. This is the best HDR gaming monitor you can get right now. Finally, there’s the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX. But, it also sports a very competitive price. It’s a bit old by now and it does come with a slower response time and a few quirks (120Hz native refresh rate, with 144Hz being available only when using two DisplayPort connections with VRR and HDR not being usable in 144Hz mode). There’s also the Acer Predator XB273K, which is the best budget 4K 144Hz gaming monitor. If you want alternatives, you could get the last year’s LG 27GN950 or the 27GN95B. Finally, the price and availability of the LG and Acer aren’t great. Next, HDR experience is average at best no matter which of the three monitors you end up with. When it comes to downsides, some users will be disappointed by contrast on all three units. The Nitro XV282K KV features USB-C with DisplayPort capability while the FI32U comes both with a USB-C DP and a KVM switch. The 27GP950 has the highest refresh rate at 160Hz but the Nitro XV282K KV and FI32U come with their own advantages.
#Best lg wide monitor under 400 series#
LG 27GP950-B & Acer Nitro XV282K KV: Best 4K gaming monitors for the RTX 3080 and RTX 3070Ĭontrast is serviceable for IPS panels (about 1000:1 on all three models) and you also get HDMI 2.1 ports on all three monitors, making all three excellent choices for both RTX 30 as well as for the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5. Finally, normal-sized gaming monitors, are either ultra-expensive (did someone mentioned the ASUS PG32UQX?) or aren’t in the same ballpark as the C1 when it comes to the overall performance, image quality, and (especially) HDR experience. On the other hand, all those BFGD monitors can’t come close to the C1 when it comes to response time, contrast, and HDR experience, let alone price. Other, more expensive OLED TVs such as the LG G1 and Sony A90J both have a better overall performance and image quality but the massive price difference isn’t worth it. Other qualities include an unlimited contrast ratio, HDMI 2.1 support, a plethora of gaming-specific settings, and a minimalistic yet quite gorgeous design. Even though the C1 can’t get as bright as some other TVs (peak brightness of about 770 nits), per-pixel backlighting found on OLED panels means that you don’t need 1000 nits of higher peak brightness for a fabulous HDR gaming experience. And while the C1 “only” has a 120Hz refresh rate, its image clarity is comparable with 240Hz gaming monitors. You also get excellent colors but for the best experience get ready to tweak image settings.
#Best lg wide monitor under 400 Pc#
OLED panel equals lightning-fast response time that cannot be matched by any other PC gaming monitor.
![best lg wide monitor under 400 best lg wide monitor under 400](https://www.windowscentral.com/sites/wpcentral.com/files/field/image/2019/03/philips-499p9h-cropped.jpg)
#Best lg wide monitor under 400 tv#
If you want the best and aren’t bothered by the minimum screen size of a whopping 48 inches and inherent risk of burn-in, the LG C1 OLED TV offers the absolute best gaming experience for RTX 3070 and RTX 3080 owners.